**DONE**
+ why not treat all the parallel port input pins with transistors?
+
+ http://emergent.unpythonic.net/01165081407 has an answer, that they
+ are used as inverters because the FPGA has weak pull-ups on those
+ pins yet those pins need to be driven low or the PC can't configure
+ the FPGA by "printing to it" .. apparently that only applies to the
+ two pins that have the inverters on them.
+
+ Duh. Of course they're inverting... how'd I miss that?
+
+ **DONE**
+
pin 49 hooked to pin 51 .. nCONFIG driven by nConfig
**DONE**
pin 87 is DEV_CLRn driving nWait to the PC
pin 90 is CLOCK hooked to db25 pin 1 whcih is nWrite
- why not treat all the parallel port input pins with transistors?
-
}
C 50400 43500 1 0 0 gnd.sym
N 50500 43800 50400 43800 4
-N 43400 47400 42000 47400 4
-{
-T 42000 47500 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
-netname=TDI
-}
-N 43400 53800 42000 53800 4
-{
-T 42000 53900 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
-netname=nCE
-}
N 43400 55000 42000 55000 4
{
T 42000 55100 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
-netname=DCLK
+netname=nWrite
}
N 43400 47800 42000 47800 4
{
T 42000 47900 5 10 1 1 0 0 1
-netname=DATA0
+netname=pport_data_0
}
N 43400 48200 42000 48200 4
{
}
N 52200 59400 52400 59400 4
N 51300 59400 50400 59400 4
+C 43300 47100 1 0 0 gnd.sym
+C 43300 53500 1 0 0 gnd.sym