move simulation results up before Results heading

[web/gag.com] / rockets / research / test5.mdwn

diff --git a/rockets/research/test5.mdwn b/rockets/research/test5.mdwn
index 4f2a59c6d642087c27ae8cdae8ed2ba220845e64..22979dfd99d6416fd8165c8402f107f5c7025983 100755 (executable)
--- a/rockets/research/test5.mdwn
+++ b/rockets/research/test5.mdwn
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ Trying again using KNSO with our new casting bases.  We also have a real
 eye-dropper now for measuring the surfactant.  4 38mm grains of 
 1.875" length, 250 gram batch using formula of
 
 eye-dropper now for measuring the surfactant.  4 38mm grains of 
 1.875" length, 250 gram batch using formula of
 

-* 65% KNO3
-* 35% Sorbitol
-* 1% red iron oxide
-* 3 drops Polystep-B1 (1 drop per 100g being the general idea)
+* 65% KNO3, 162.5g
+* 35% Sorbitol, 87.5g
+* 1% red iron oxide, 2.5g, added after melt
+* 3 drops Polystep-B1, added before pour

 
 ## Process ##
 
 
 ## Process ##
 


@@ -65,9 +65,11 @@ Motor          : H170
 
 These four grains were assembled in an AT 38/480 case with a random AT
 delay grain from the pile of left-overs, and flown in Robert's Madcow
 
 These four grains were assembled in an AT 38/480 case with a random AT
 delay grain from the pile of left-overs, and flown in Robert's Madcow

-Little John at Tripoli Colorado Spring Fling 2015.  We used a Slim Gem
-igniter from Quickburst.  Great flight!  The motor seemed to come up to
-pressure quickly, and burned brilliantly.
+Little John at Tripoli Colorado Spring Fling 2015.  We used a 
+[Slim Gem](http://www.quickburst.net/slim_gem_igniter.htm)
+igniter from [Quickburst](http://www.quickburst.net/).  Great 
+flight!  The motor seemed to come up to pressure quickly, and burned 
+brilliantly.

 
 The airframe weighed 1200 grams ready to launch, and 982 grams post-flight,
 of which 1g or so was BP in the ejection charge, and a few grams were in 
 
 The airframe weighed 1200 grams ready to launch, and 982 grams post-flight,
 of which 1g or so was BP in the ejection charge, and a few grams were in 


@@ -97,4 +99,6 @@ seconds after coming up to pressure.  The regressive curve seems a bit
 exagerated in the flight accel data, which seems completely explainable by
 the nozzle throat erosion causing pressure to faill during that period.
 
 exagerated in the flight accel data, which seems completely explainable by
 the nozzle throat erosion causing pressure to faill during that period.
 

-Pretty cool for our first real flight test!
+The airframe saw an average of 12 G acceleration on the way to Mach 0.6 and
+2838 feet above the laucnh site which is at 8800 feet MSL.  Perfect 
+recovery!  Pretty cool for our first real flight test!