altos/stm: Note that ao_i2c_recv_dma_isr isn't actually used
[fw/altos] / src / stm / ao_i2c_stm.c
index 59cad4951058fce99d360da9ce91cbc47f58720c..c02bc5a535169f0922b638f4947756c8d5133256 100644 (file)
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ ao_i2c_send(void *block, uint16_t len, uint8_t index, uint8_t stop)
                stm_i2c->cr1 = AO_STM_I2C_CR1 | (1 << STM_I2C_CR1_STOP);
                ao_i2c_wait_stop(index);
        }
-       return TRUE;
+       return true;
 }
 
 void
@@ -300,10 +300,10 @@ uint8_t
 ao_i2c_recv(void *block, uint16_t len, uint8_t index, uint8_t stop)
 {
        struct stm_i2c  *stm_i2c = ao_i2c_stm_info[index].stm_i2c;
-       uint8_t         ret = TRUE;
+       uint8_t         ret = true;
 
        if (len == 0)
-               return TRUE;
+               return true;
        if (len == 1) {
                ao_i2c_recv_data[index] = block;
                ao_i2c_recv_len[index] = 1;
@@ -341,6 +341,17 @@ ao_i2c_recv(void *block, uint16_t len, uint8_t index, uint8_t stop)
                                    (0 << STM_DMA_CCR_PINC) |
                                    (0 << STM_DMA_CCR_CIRC) |
                                    (STM_DMA_CCR_DIR_PER_TO_MEM << STM_DMA_CCR_DIR));
+
+               /* XXX ao_i2c_recv_dma_isr hasn't ever been used, so it
+                * doesn't appear to be necessary. Testing with a device
+                * that uses i2c would really be useful here to discover
+                * whether this function is necessary or not.
+                */
+#if 0
+               ao_dma_set_isr(rx_dma_index, ao_i2c_recv_dma_isr);
+#else
+               (void) ao_i2c_recv_dma_isr;
+#endif
                stm_i2c->cr1 = AO_STM_I2C_CR1 | (1 << STM_I2C_CR1_ACK);
                stm_i2c->cr2 = AO_STM_I2C_CR2 |
                        (1 << STM_I2C_CR2_DMAEN) | (1 << STM_I2C_CR2_LAST);