From 5c478d87c187287c8d77a2f331f6732d7e732de5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bdale Garbee Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:57:16 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] need the referenced files, too! --- rockets/research/2017-batch-09.mdwn | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ rockets/research/2017-test-13.mdwn | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100755 rockets/research/2017-batch-09.mdwn create mode 100755 rockets/research/2017-test-13.mdwn diff --git a/rockets/research/2017-batch-09.mdwn b/rockets/research/2017-batch-09.mdwn new file mode 100755 index 0000000..c3dc31a --- /dev/null +++ b/rockets/research/2017-batch-09.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +# Batch 2017-batch-09 # + +8 grains of 75mm using sorbitol, intended to be a reload for my CTI Pro75 6xl +case with Loki nozzle and forward closure. Grain length 4.375" with 0.125" +spacing per grain, so we'll make the casting tubes 4.5" long. Delrin coring +rods of 0.75" diameter. + +To overcome shrinkage noticed in the last batch, fill lines set based on the +total 4.5" casting tube length, on the assumption that any shrinkage will +provide sufficient inter-grain spacing. + +Formula for a batch size of 4800g: + +* 65% KNO3, 3120g +* 35% Sorbitol, 1680g +* 1% red iron oxide, 48g, added after melt +* 72 drops Polystep-B1, added before pour using eye dropper + +This formula is completely fluid with 225F indicated on the Presto Multicooker, +but viscosity is noticeabley lower making for easier pouring at 250-275F. + +These grains were cast on 15 October 2017. + +## Results ## + +This batch made for a pretty full Presto, and a fairly long time coming up +to temperature. It seems like 5kg might be the most propellant I should try +to melt at one time. As an aside, that means for my 6" O project, we'd be +melting and casting one grain at a time... + +Average casting tube weight 15.3g. + +* Grain 1, 542g gross, 527g net +* Grain 2, 548g gross, 533g net +* Grain 3, 552g gross, 537g net +* Grain 4, 546g gross, 531g net +* Grain 5, 544g gross, 529g net +* Grain 6, 540g gross, 525g net +* Grain 7, 528g gross, 513g net +* Grain 8, 538g gross, 523g net + +Total propellant load 4218g. That's enough lower than the anticipated mass +that I decided to "top off" the grains with more melted propellant from the +left-overs in this batch. Will re-weigh after they cool/cure. + + diff --git a/rockets/research/2017-test-13.mdwn b/rockets/research/2017-test-13.mdwn new file mode 100755 index 0000000..c73bc0e --- /dev/null +++ b/rockets/research/2017-test-13.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +# Test 2017-13 # + +8 grain 75mm sorbitol motor with pyrodex pellet ignition in 4-inch Wildman +rebuilt airframe at Tripoli Colorado Hartsel. + +CTI Pro75 6xl case, Loki #52 (long) nozzle with 2 o-rings, CTI forward and aft +closure rings, forward bulkhead from Terry's pile machined to have 0.5" inside +snap ring plus 0.25" inside liner, with two o-rings, one pushing against liner. +Liner 37" long with just under 36" available for fuel load. + +Original simulation says this should be a a 26% M-2291 with 6138 Ns total +impulse, 869 psi max, 75% volume loading, and about 2.3 seconds burn +time. After casting and weighing the grains, the adjusted simulation says +this will be a 5% M-1785, 699 psi, 67% volume loading, and about 2.7secs burn. + +## Results ## + +Flown at last Tripoli Colorado launch of 2017 at the Hartsel launch +site. Perfect flight, no damage. Mach 1.1 on the way to 13711 ft AGL +by GPS, with a 2.8 sec burn time. Winds at ground level 5-7mph, used +Terry's launch trailer (20 ft 1515 rail), landing was 1 mile to the SSE, +across the creek on state owned land south of the road. Crowd response +was very positive. Largest sugar motor known to have been flown in +Colorado to date. Spectacular! + +Flight data logged as sn 3121, flight 4 on 2017-10-22. + +Used a Chinese e-match with 2 pyrodex pellets on a 1/8" dowel inserted so +the aft end of the pellets was 36" from the aft end of the case. The time +from button press to smoke and then to acceleration was surprisingly short! + +Terry Lee captured launch video. + +I captured high-speed still of the launch. + +The acceleration plot looks pretty clean, with some bumps near burn-out that +strike me as maybe being related to propellant flaking off the inside of the +casting tubes? + + -- 2.30.2