X-Git-Url: https://git.gag.com/?p=web%2Fgag.com;a=blobdiff_plain;f=rockets%2Fresearch%2Ftest5.mdwn;h=23f80a1ce2cf9c9f5b539fd5786ea198a1d65595;hp=ca27d89bdbbbf68c109a0d20e137ee3e6c5c57a7;hb=a14ba311ab903887ab759c867464c5cea1a0a608;hpb=2f24dee781b78df3c6a71b374c182cfa2fc2f87d diff --git a/rockets/research/test5.mdwn b/rockets/research/test5.mdwn index ca27d89..23f80a1 100755 --- a/rockets/research/test5.mdwn +++ b/rockets/research/test5.mdwn @@ -24,24 +24,8 @@ cap installed and grain tapped down. * Grain 3, 52.30g net * Grain 4, 51.23g net -## Observations ## - -Pour went really smoothly. One grain looked "perfect" with the propellant -settled evenly and a couple mm of open gap at the top of the casting -tube. We think this one may have been slightly under-filled compared to -the others, all of which had some evidence of propellant sticking to the -cap and leaving an uneven top surface. This resulted in some quick trim -work with a knife, ergo final grain masses not matching all that well. - -## Flight Test ## +## Simulation ## -These four grains were assembled in an AT 38/480 case with a random AT -delay grain from the pile of left-overs, and flown in Robert's Madcow -Little John at Tripoli Colorado Spring Fling 2015. We used a Slim Gem -igniter from Quickburst. Great flight! The motor seemed to come up to -pressure quickly, and burned brilliantly. - -The original simulator data:
 Propellant             : propellants/knsb.xml
 Nozzle diameter        : 0.739 cm (0.291") (19/64")
@@ -74,3 +58,41 @@ Average Thrust : 169.555 N
 
 Motor          : H170
 
+ +![simulation data](test5-sim.png) + +## Flight Test ## + +These four grains were assembled in an AT 38/480 case with a random AT +delay grain from the pile of left-overs, and flown in Robert's Madcow +Little John at Tripoli Colorado Spring Fling 2015. We used a Slim Gem +igniter from Quickburst. Great flight! The motor seemed to come up to +pressure quickly, and burned brilliantly. + +The airframe weighed 1200 grams ready to launch, and 982 grams post-flight, +of which 1g or so was BP in the ejection charge, and a few grams were in +the Aerotech delay grain. + +Post-flight measurement of the phenolic nozzle showed approximately an +0.330" throat, which clearly indicates some erosion from the 0.291" starting +point. + +![flight acceleration data](test5-altosui.png) + +## Observations ## + +Pour went really smoothly. One grain looked "perfect" with the propellant +settled evenly and a couple mm of open gap at the top of the casting +tube. We think this one may have been slightly under-filled compared to +the others, all of which had some evidence of propellant sticking to the +cap and leaving an uneven top surface. This resulted in some quick trim +work with a knife, ergo final grain masses not matching all that well. + +We were totally stoked that the burn time matched simulation (once we factor +in a tenth of a second or two before the motor came up to pressure!). We +were also pleased that the max pressure was "right on time" at about 0.4 +seconds after coming up to pressure. The regressive curve seems a bit +exagerated in the flight accel data, which seems completely explainable by +the nozzle throat erosion causing pressure to faill during that period. + +Pretty cool for our first real flight test!