From acdf13612f55c3a4abd4f2f05d759a4fd2fdf7d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@corganenterprises.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:12:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Better fix for broken AC_PROG_F77 macro

* Move AC_PROG_CC into GR_FORTRAN macro definition
---
 config/gr_fortran.m4 | 1 +
 configure.ac         | 1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/config/gr_fortran.m4 b/config/gr_fortran.m4
index b5b0470f..a558b2f7 100644
--- a/config/gr_fortran.m4
+++ b/config/gr_fortran.m4
@@ -28,5 +28,6 @@ AC_DEFUN([GR_FORTRAN],[
     then
         AC_PROG_F77
         AC_F77_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS
+	AC_PROG_CC dnl bux fix to restore $ac_ext
     fi
 ])
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 4b90b723..2bb37935 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ AC_ENABLE_SHARED	dnl do build shared libraries
 AC_DISABLE_STATIC	dnl don't build static libraries
 m4_ifdef([LT_INIT],[LT_INIT],[AC_PROG_LIBTOOL])
 GR_FORTRAN
-AC_PROG_CC		dnl ensure $ac_ext set correctly after Fortran test
 
 GR_NO_UNDEFINED		dnl do we need the -no-undefined linker flag
 GR_SCRIPTING
-- 
2.47.2