reverted change in 658 and simply removed the busted warning for now.
authoroharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60>
Mon, 19 May 2008 20:11:05 +0000 (20:11 +0000)
committeroharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60>
Mon, 19 May 2008 20:11:05 +0000 (20:11 +0000)
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@668 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60

src/jtag/jtag.c

index 1e0e889bff808b3a7d697f27facecec227e93f21..e0b008baf0702680c399dc69c0b7423569d48053 100644 (file)
@@ -937,7 +937,8 @@ void jtag_add_reset(int req_tlr_or_trst, int req_srst)
                                ((req_srst&&!jtag_srst)||
                                                (!req_srst&&jtag_srst)))
                {
-                       LOG_ERROR("BUG: transition of req_tlr_or_trst and req_srst in the same jtag_add_reset() call is undefined");
+                       // FIX!!! srst_pulls_trst allows 1,1 => 0,0 transition....
+                       //LOG_ERROR("BUG: transition of req_tlr_or_trst and req_srst in the same jtag_add_reset() call is undefined");
                }
        }
        
@@ -1592,7 +1593,8 @@ int jtag_init_reset(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx)
        if (jtag_reset_config & RESET_HAS_SRST)
        {
                jtag_add_reset(1, 1);
-               jtag_add_reset(0, 1);
+               if ((jtag_reset_config & RESET_SRST_PULLS_TRST)==0)
+                       jtag_add_reset(0, 1);
        }
        jtag_add_reset(0, 0);
        if ((retval = jtag_execute_queue()) != ERROR_OK)