X-Git-Url: https://git.gag.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=rockets%2Fresearch%2Ftest3.mdwn;fp=rockets%2Fresearch%2Ftest3.mdwn;h=dda3d09e5610ae1de23492616efc3c7d2d6806ae;hb=2f24dee781b78df3c6a71b374c182cfa2fc2f87d;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hpb=94cbcfd669bbd7985a8b3ea158279be3c232e765;p=web%2Fgag.com diff --git a/rockets/research/test3.mdwn b/rockets/research/test3.mdwn new file mode 100755 index 0000000..dda3d09 --- /dev/null +++ b/rockets/research/test3.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +# Test 3 # + +First attempt using Erythritol. Simulation suggested that putting 5 +long grains in a 38/720 case would yield a reasonable motor. + +Formula is a simple mix of 65% KNO3 and 35% Erythritol. Both used in +granular form directly from stock. Because Scott Fintel's site +indicated near infinite pot life in the multi-cooker, We decided to +melt enough for 8 grains, or a 520 gram batch size. + +Before starting this batch, we cut our two delrin mandrels in half to +get 4 single grain mandrels. + +[Tru-Core](http://www.rocketsaway.com/html/casting_sets.html) +casting set with four bases each set up with 0.5 inch mandrels. Four +pieces of casting tube cut to grain length of 2.250 inches. + +## Process ## + +The multi-cooker was preheated to about 250F with the lid on. Temp was +increased during melting to 300F indicated. + +We poured/scooped one grain at a time, leaving the multi-cooker heating +and putting the lid back on between grains to keep the propellant at +temperature. The propellant was really hard to pour into the 38mm grains +with mandrel already in place. Lots of drips over the side. We reduced +heat to about 225F while waiting for the first 4 grains to solidify. It +was easy to pull the coring rods after an hour or so. The caps were a +bit hard to remove. + +Given how much trouble we had pouring into grains with the mandrel already +in place, we paused to fabricate some new casting bases using the CNC +router and left-over hickory flooring material. The resulting bases are +used with aluminum foil to hold a casting tube each. The casting tubes +are marked with a fill line on the inside ahead of time, then the mandrels +are pushed into place after the propellant is poured, penetrating the foil +bottom. A cap is then placed over the mandrel and casting tube to keep the +mandrel centered. This worked a lot better! We called this test 3B. + +## Results ## + +* Test 3, Grain 1, 61.78g net +* Test 3, Grain 2, 61.54g net +* Test 3, Grain 3, 61.84g net +* Test 3, Grain 4, 61.89g net + +* Test 3B, Grain 5, 60.36g net +* Test 3B, Grain 6, 61.23g net +* Test 3B, Grain 7, 60.40g net +* Test 3B, Grain 8, 60.79g net + +## Observations ## + +The new casting bases worked very well, but we did notice a problem with +the caps. When the propellant is carefully controlled to completely fill +a grain, it touches the bottom side of the flat caps when still hot and +wet. When it cools and contracts, this leaves a thin skin above a ring +of mostly air. Cutting the "skin" off the top and scraping a bit to leave +each grain with a slightly concave top so there'd be burn space between +grains left us with remarkably consistent looking and weighing grains. In +future, we might want to either fill the casting tubes slightly less, or +perhaps switch to caps with an explicit air space above the poured +propellant in hopes that all bubbles would "surface" leaving the propellant +solid and with a bit of air gap at the top of each grain's casting tube. +