fix overlapping sloc problem
[fw/sdcc] / src / ds390 / ralloc.c
index 871e761ff8a1070b4c8d7c7fd3c10a1690d61e70..3fab7c2dc497c4f3e161e0c9d050642ee650a617 100644 (file)
@@ -380,13 +380,11 @@ noOverLap (set * itmpStack, symbol * fsym)
 {
   symbol *sym;
 
-
   for (sym = setFirstItem (itmpStack); sym;
        sym = setNextItem (itmpStack))
     {
-      if (sym->liveTo > fsym->liveFrom)
+      if (sym->liveTo >= fsym->liveFrom)
        return 0;
-
     }
 
   return 1;
@@ -1149,19 +1147,21 @@ serialRegAssign (eBBlock ** ebbs, int count)
 
              /* if it has a spillocation & is used less than
                 all other live ranges then spill this */
-             if (willCS && sym->usl.spillLoc)
-               {
-
-                 symbol *leastUsed =
-                 leastUsedLR (liveRangesWith (spillable,
-                                              allLRs,
-                                              ebbs[i],
-                                              ic));
-                 if (leastUsed &&
-                     leastUsed->used > sym->used)
-                   {
-                     spillThis (sym);
-                     continue;
+               if (willCS) {
+                   if (sym->usl.spillLoc) {
+                       symbol *leastUsed = leastUsedLR (liveRangesWith (spillable,
+                                                                        allLRs, ebbs[i], ic));
+                       if (leastUsed && leastUsed->used > sym->used) {
+                           spillThis (sym);
+                           continue;
+                       }
+                   } else {
+                       /* if none of the liveRanges have a spillLocation then better
+                          to spill this one than anything else already assigned to registers */
+                       if (liveRangesWith(spillable,noSpilLoc,ebbs[i],ic)) {
+                           spillThis (sym);
+                           continue;
+                       }
                    }
                }
 
@@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ static bool
 isBitwiseOptimizable (iCode * ic)
 {
   sym_link *ltype = getSpec (operandType (IC_LEFT (ic)));
-  // jwk sym_link *rtype = getSpec (operandType (IC_RIGHT (ic)));
+  sym_link *rtype = getSpec (operandType (IC_RIGHT (ic)));
 
   /* bitwise operations are considered optimizable
      under the following conditions (Jean-Louis VERN) 
@@ -2208,7 +2208,10 @@ packForPush (iCode * ic, eBBlock * ebp)
   for (lic = ic; lic != dic ; lic = lic->prev) {
          if (bitVectBitValue(dbv,lic->key)) return ;
   }
-
+  /* extend the live range of replaced operand if needed */
+  if (OP_SYMBOL(IC_RIGHT(dic))->liveTo < ic->seq) {
+         OP_SYMBOL(IC_RIGHT(dic))->liveTo = ic->seq;
+  }
   /* we now we know that it has one & only one def & use
      and the that the definition is an assignment */
   IC_LEFT (ic) = IC_RIGHT (dic);